關於哈特接受論證的深度討論…中研院法學期刊第14期(Duscussions of Hart’s Acceptance Argument)

莊世同教授在中央研究院法學期刊第13期發表了一篇文章:法律的概念與法律的規範性來源-重省哈特的接受論證(線上文章在此本部落格之前轉載資訊在此),之後在第14期的中研院法學期刊中,刊載了三篇針對莊教授文章的回應,分別由許家馨教授王鵬翔教授,以及陳景輝教授的回應文章,而莊老師也再次撰文回應三位教授的意見中研院法學期刊第14期按此線上閱讀)。這一系列的對話非常精彩,除了莊老師的討論主題是法理學的核心課程之外,三位教授的回應提供了更深層的思辨課題。印象中,這似乎是中研院法學期刊第一次刊載回應文,真是很棒的規劃。對於法理學有興趣的人,這一場對話議題不應該錯過!強烈推薦!

Academic Sinica Law Review has published three comments on Prof. Chuang’s article, The Concept of Law and the Sources of Legal Normativity- Hart’s Acceptance Argument Reconsidered. (my previous post). This might be the first time that ASLR adopts the style of comment, definitely benefiting academic discussions. The authors in three comments specialize in legal philosophy. These three comments are Prof. Jimmy Chia-Shih Hsu‘s From the Acceptance Argument to the In-depth Internal Point of View, Prof. Peng-Hsiang Wang‘s Can the Attitude of Acceptance Justify the Normativity of Law, and Prof. Jing-Hui Chen’s Hart’s Acceptance Argument and the Normativity of Law. Prof. Chuang‘s response is The Normativity of Law and the Duty of Judges.

PS. I cannot find Prof. Jing-Hui Chen‘s English profile. He is a law faculty at the law school of China University of Political Science and Law. Three comments and the response have not English abstract either.

Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s