Brian Tamanaha on The Mounting Evidence Against the ‘Formalist Age’ (Tamanaha論反對「形式主義年代」的證據)

Brian Tamanaha在SSRN發表了一篇文章:The Mounting Evidence Against the ‘Formalist Age’,這篇文章是用來反駁法史學家- Alfred Brophy在去年發表的書評:Did Formalism Never Exist?。Brophy的書評反對Tamanaha在Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide一書中對於一般認為法唯實論是起源於對於十九世紀末,二十世紀初美國法學的形式主義而起的。Tamanaha這篇短文就是在提供證據,反駁Brophy的論點,Tamanaha認為許多證據可以顯示他的論點是正確的。推薦閱讀!

Tamanaha討論形式主義的書並不好閱讀,可能是有太多的歷史素材在裡面。相當程度上,我認為這一篇文章可以作為閱讀本書的預備文章。此外,Beyond the Formalist-Realist Divide這一本書也很推薦閱讀!會對於美國形式主義與唯實論之爭有一些新的啟發!

Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s