Brian Leiter關於法哲學家的排名調查結果

相關資訊在此。前十名的排名如下:

1. H.L.A. Hart  (Condorcet winner: wins contests with all other choices)
2. Joseph Raz  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 139–35
3. Ronald Dworkin  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 141–31, loses to Joseph Raz by 91–85
4. John Finnis  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 158–17, loses to Ronald Dworkin by 125–47
5. Joel Feinberg  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 168–3, loses to John Finnis by 79–75
6. Jeremy Waldron  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 169–11, loses to Joel Feinberg by 84–63
7. Lon Fuller  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 167–6, loses to Jeremy Waldron by 80–68
8. Jules Coleman  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 167–4, loses to Lon Fuller by 85–42
9. Tony Honore  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 172–2, loses to Jules Coleman by 69–54
10. R.A. Duff  loses to H.L.A. Hart by 167–1, loses to Tony Honore by 62–47

文末討論雖不令人訝異,但Lon Fuller無疑是非常重要的一個思想家,特別是對於法治觀念的理解上。此外,這個排序僅供參考,結果所顯示出的是參與者的偏好傾向。如果圍繞著第幾名打轉,倒是有一點沒那麼大意義。但是,更有趣的或許是Les Green在評論中所提到的,前十位中有六位跟Hart有關係。如果將此排序結果與參與投票者背景做分析,應該會有有趣的發現。供大家做參考!


3 Comments on “Brian Leiter關於法哲學家的排名調查結果”

  1. 吳允中 says:

    Feinberg 有前五,但相對來說我實在對他很不熟⋯

    • Marx Chen says:

      Joel Feinberg很重要,關於他的簡短介紹,可以看這一篇http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/05/us/joel-feinberg-77-influential-philosopher.html?_r=0)。但若是理論的話,可以參考SEP的The Limits of Law (http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/05/us/joel-feinberg-77-influential-philosopher.html?_r=0) 或是IEP的這個辭條(http://www.iep.utm.edu/law-phil/)。

      我對他的ˇ論也沒有很全面的認識,最熟悉的仍然是刑法理論以及基礎的法理學立場。他有寫過一本小書:Social Philosophy,我認為是很值得做為法學緒論的導讀書目。(雖名為Social Philosophy,但是內容卻是法學基礎觀念介紹。)


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s