Jeremy Waldron on What a Dissenting Opinion Should Have Said in Obergefell v. Hodges

Jeremy Waldron在SSRN上面發表了一篇文章:What a Dissenting Opinion Should Have Said in Obergefell v. Hodges,算是模擬聯邦最高法院法官針對美國同性婚姻合憲性的不同意見書,很精彩。雖然是針對Obergefell v. Hodges的不同意見書(關於Obergefell一案的簡介在此),但是他不是反對同性婚姻,而是反對是否要跳過各州立法者的程序直接從聯邦層級下手進行改變,所以他的討論其實是鑲嵌在一個美國在聯邦與州權限分配上的脈絡下討論。很有意思,全文不長,10多頁而已,推薦給大家!



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s