Mark Greenberg’s Responses to The Law of Interpretation

Mark Greenberg在SSRN上面發表了一篇文章:What Makes a Method of Legal Interpretation Correct? Legal Standards vs. Fundamental Determinants。這是一篇非常精彩的文章,Mark Greenberg回應了William Baude以及Sterphen Sachs合寫的文章:The Law of Interpretation。Baude跟Sachs的文章嚴格來說不是處理法理學核心議題的文章,而是法律解釋或是法律推理的單篇文章,也是很值得一念!!文中借用了Greenberg的術語,但是恰巧觀點跟Greenberg非常不一樣,因此Greenberg寫了本篇文章討論,主張法律文本的語義意涵(the linguistic meaning of the legal texts)與法律的內容(the content of the law)是不一樣的,在法律判斷上即便是實務工作者也無法像Baude與Sachs的宣稱一般,僅透過探詢法律的語意意涵就理解法律!!這兩篇分別是在我在年假時閱讀的(Baude跟Sachs的文章比較早出來,歷經數次修正,而本部落格所附之連結是正式版本),非常非常精彩!強烈推薦給大家!!

Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s