Ronald Drowkin on Hart’s Postcript(Ronald Dworkin對於哈特後記的批判)

很抱歉,之前因為事務很多部落格一直沒有更新。現在,在新的工作規劃塵埃落定之後,部落格應該可以持續更新。

將近一個月後的恢復更新,部落格轉載了Harvard Law Review最新一期內容,他們刊載了Ronald Dworkin在生前一直未出版的文章,對於哈特法律的概念中「後記」的回應。HLR在同期中亦刊載了Nicos Stavropoulos對於Dworkin文章的背景說明。Nicos Stavropoulos的介紹文章在此(按此瀏覽),而Ronald Dworkin的文章在此(按此瀏覽

這兩篇文章都非常推薦給大家!Stavropoulos對於這篇文章的生成背景給予了清楚與簡單的說明,也提及到了在94年當時NYU的研討會仍舊是紙本為主要資訊傳遞方式(的確是,我最早的e-mail是ms2.hinet.net開頭的,當時的電子郵件在台灣仍舊是很早的發展),之後紙本都不見了,連Dwokin本人都沒有了,幸好還有人有掃描!

Dworkin dithered for a long time but publication remained on the cards. A few years later he confirmed that he intended to publish “a substantial response” to the Postscript in the near future. To my knowledge he never made a firm decision either way and eventually lost the draft. He was unable to provide a copy when, many years later, I couldn’t locate mine and discovered that everyone else seemed also to have lost theirs: he said that his original electronic file was lost when his hard disk failed. (I am grateful to Dr. Luís Duarte d’Almeida, who sent me a scan of the manuscript that had somehow come into his possession.)

我尚未很仔細地將Hart’s Posthumous Reply做論證分析,但是初步閱讀的想法是,對於Ronald Dworkin理論有興趣的人,應該不能錯過這一篇,雖然他在法理論的成熟想法都已經出版,但是這一篇在行文的風格上都跟他成熟著作有一些差別!光是文字就可以見到他如何看待哈特會如何看待他自己的後記,以及他如何遲一個保留態度上閱讀哈特的後記!!強烈推薦給大家!!千萬不要錯過!!

Advertisements


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s